Blonde Hair vs. The Evidence: Prosecutors Dismiss Charges Previously Filed Against Teacher Kristen Goodwin Roush

Blonde Hair vs. The Evidence: California Prosecutors Dismiss Charges Previously Filed Against Teacher Kristen Goodwin Roush

By Special Correspondent:Ron Thomas. Blonde Hair matters! There are those that believe that "Blondes are beautiful. Blondes are smart. Blondes are fun."What we do know is that all women, regardless of hair-color or eye-color deserve scholarships and financial-aid. However, Blondes should not escape prosecution solely based upon hair-color or eye-color. Kristen Goodwin Roush is the latest in a recent long list of blonde female teachers who were once arrested and charged with some form of perversity upon a male student, only to have the charges mysteriously reduced, dropped, or simply dismissed by male prosecutors without an opportunity to present the evidence before a jury. Although countries like Sweden, Norway, Finland, have a much higher percentage of natural blondes, most U.S. blondes are not natural. Most U.S. male prosecutors have never been to such European countries, and therefor there is no distinction of natural vs. formula blondes. What is important to note, however, is that hair-color, eye-color, gender, and unfortunately race are still dominant features in U.S. jurisprudence. Indeed, the decision to charge, indict, or arrest, and to seek a conviction, can be cast aside entirely based upon these superficial characteristics. Statistics from the U.S. Sentencing Commission, and the vast disparity of sentences of men vs. women, and white vs. minority verify these statistics. Blonde hair may matter to California prosecutors, but not in the California Scholarship community. All students, regardless of race, gender, hair-color, and nationality have a fair chance of being awarded many scholarships.

Kristen Michelle Roush, a 34-year-old eighth grade teacher at La Paz Intermediate School in Mission Viejo was arrested at her Aliso Viejo home in October of 2014 for an alleged inappropriate relationship with a male juvenile student. A month-long investigation preceded the arrest. Evidence collected included interviews with several witnesses and evidence obtained from the cell phones of the blonde-haired teacher and student, says Lt. Jeff Hallock, the sheriff's spokesman. No ethical teacher sends any text messages to a student. California prosecutors knew also that Kristen Goodwin Roush was blonde, married, and a school teacher. Those facts would complicate the "investigation."

However, the parents of the alleged 8th-grade victim believed that blonde-haired Kristen Michelle Roush had an improper relationship with the male student. Most parents are not stupid. What led the parents to believe that Kristen Michelle Roush was interested in their little boy? In fact, this author had previously written that most female perverts engage in perverted acts with male students because they are aware that only a small percentage of such crimes will be seriously prosecuted, and the hallways of most schools provide a convenient cover for perverted female teachers seeking to molest males half or triple their age. Fair-skinned, Blonde female perverts are rarely prosecuted and might as well laugh at the local prosecutors. There is no need for California Blonde female suspects to even hire attorneys. If a blonde female suspect came to my law office and if I were an attorney, I would simply advise all blonde female perverts to ignore all communication from local prosecutors, and they will eventually cave in. The typical weak U.S. male prosecutor will ultimately cave in and use his position to even pursue a romantic relationship with the female he is supposed to be prosecuting. That is why the evidence clearly shows that certain types of female predators are rarely prosecuted, and rarely sent to any prison.

I'm completely innocent of all the charges,, said the blonde female Mission Viejo junior high school teacher outside the courthouse last November, after she pleaded not guilty to committing lewd acts with a 14-year-old male student. What exactly were the "lewd acts?" One of the most common defenses used by perverted and disgusting female perverts when accused of hugging a male student young enough to be their son is that "The hug was only an innocent hug, and didn't mean anything." 99% of all perverted female teachers that use that worn out excuse is a liar and a pervert. They typically embrace the male student as they would a lover or a scene from a romantic movie, but they are quick to avoid any hint of even eye contact with older male teachers their own age. How many men her own age has Kristen Roush performed "innocent hugs" on? If the hug was so "innocent" as she claimed then why didn't she do in the presence of her husband or the school principal? Every lewd act by an upright walking human or subhuman involves use of the legs or their hands.

In the world of education, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN "INNOCENT HUG" by a teacher upon a student. Such acts are lewd, perverted, and disgusting, and any teacher engaging in such conduct should be arrested, and forced to appear before a jury. I previously wrote that "Kristen Roush had no problem distributing her filthy legs to a little eighth-grade boy..."

In response, a perverted and sick-minded defender of Kristen Roush remarked that the article was defamatory, and deliberately false. He also attempted to attribute comments directed towards dirty and filthy Laura Whitehurst as being meant for Kristen Roush. Let me get this straight: Law enforcement agencies in California ARRESTED AND CHARGED Kristen Roush based upon a legal and legitimate investigation that included "interviews with several witnesses and evidence obtained from the cell phones of the teacher and student, says Lt. Jeff Hallock, the sheriff's spokesman. Kristen Roush used her dirty legs and dirty hands to drive the male student to a location not authorized by the student's parents; she used her dirty legs to walk the male student to the car; she used her dirty legs to open the car door for a young male student; she used her dirty legs to put on female clothes knowing that a male student would see the clothes; and, she apparently used her dirty hands to perform an "innocent hug" on a male student. Kristen Roush is neither a virgin nor a Nun. The fact that she has children suggests that has had intercourse with a male. Therefore, she is by definition a "dirty" woman. Only virgin women who never committed a sin are "clean" women. Kristen Roush HAS NO BUSINESS touching any MALE OR FEMALE student for any reason unless she is licensed in CPR, and performing a life-saving duty. Keep your dirty hands and dirty mind away from students! Hug your husband, if he is willing to tolerate you!

TV Station KTLA is not the most ethical of California TV stations. What Judge or prosecutor specifically stated that Kristen Roush has been "Cleared of Lewd Acts"? That is what KTLA-5 wants the public to believe. Where is the court transcript or prosecutor memorandum that specifically states in no uncertain terms the arrest and charges of this female suspect was a mistake; that she should have never been charged; and, that no further evidence is being considered in her prosecution? No such record to my knowledge exists. If I pay an Orange County prosecutor to dismiss charges against me or my friend, and the prosecutor agrees then that does not "clear" the charges. This blog author has far superior standards and ethics than the KTLA station or California prosecutors. KTLA-5 is simply demonstrating a preference for a judicial outcome. If the suspect were legally "cleared of all charges" then there is no judicial basis to enter into a plea bargain. Blonde female predators need to be punished just like other law breakers who prey upon young students. Students deserve protection, and this author is one of their few defenders. Blondes are easy targets for ISIS and other terrorist recruiters, and we need to clamp down on Blonde preferences.

Kristen Roush claimed she was "unaware" that the male student had not been provided permission to ride in her car. At the same time, she hypocritcally claimed that "'kids lie all the time." Ok, Ms. Kristen Roush, WHY DID YOU ALLOW A MALE STUDENT IN YOUR CAR THAT YOU NOW CLAIM IS A LIAR? Are you a Blonde predator or just plain brainless? You knew this student, and you were familiar with this student! You can't have it both ways!!! Which are you!?

KTLA-5 should retract its misleading statement that Kristen Roush has been "cleared" of all charges. Charges were simply dropped. Only a trial judge, or jury can declare a suspect completely "clear" of all charges. In this case, it is widely suspected that the male prosecutors simply dismissed the case to suit the blonde suspect; this is routine all over the United States, except in the South and in Utah. Blonde suspects want it both ways.

The weakness and impotence of Orange County prosecutors, and their cowardly decision to refuse to allow an impartial jury to decide the evidence, has nothing to do with the "innocence" of the suspect. Dismissing charges merely confirms that Blonde Hair matters. Only a jury can exonerate a suspect once a suspect is formally charged. Furthermore, news media sources report that "based on information obtained from various methods of communication, investigators believe Roush had an inappropriate relationship with the student." Orange County Sheriff's Department officers therefore officers arrested the Kristen Goodwin Roush on lewd and lascivious acts with a child. The fact that California prosecutors are too weak, too impotent, and too impressed with suspect's Blonde hair and blue-eyes is irrelevant to the initial charges. Various charges were dismissed against Kristen Roush probably because male prosecutors were afraid if the case went to trial, a jury could possible convict the suspect. The sentencing and conviction record of blonde female predators is pathetic in the U.S.A. To my knowledge, there has been no judicial determination via a trial judge or jury as to the evidence against the charged suspect. Therefore, I do not share the misrepresented statement that Kristen Roush has been "cleared" of all charges. In truth, the male prosecutors and wek law enforcement of Orange County can't stomach the prosecution of blonde female predators. They REFUSED to present their CASE-IN-CHIEF before a jury and let a jury decide the facts. They REFUSED to stand up to their charges once it became clear that the blonde suspect would not back down. Furthermore, how does a dismissed teacher even afford two quality legal attorneys? If she has very litte funds, what did she pay with?

All licensed teachers in California are required to sign an ethical contract. A teaching contract, and the annual video sessions that all teachers are required to take, evidence that driving a student home in your personal car is prohibited. Kristen Roush also knew that Rule #2 is to NEVER BE ALONE WITH A STUDENT. Ok. Some people will argue that Kristen Roush is only guilty of acting like a "blonde." However, the police charged her with a crime because the police KNOW THE TEACHER RULES, AND POLICE KNOW WHAT TEACHERS ARE TRAINED NOT TO DO, AND POLICE KNOW THAT HUGGING A STUDENT IS NEVER ACCEPTABLE BEHAVIOR. Is Kristen Roush going to provide the public a copy of the original criminal complaint against her? Not likely. Is Kristen Roush going to provide the public with phone numbers to all of her friends, husband, and other students she has been in contact with? Is she going to share her supposed or alleged text messages from her cell-phone? Is she willing to discuss and detail all aspects of her sex life? Lastly, Kristen Roush is not O.J. Simpson. Mr. Simpson went through a full jury trial, and was aquitted of all charges; Kristen Roush simply had her charges dropped because the male prosecutors are too weak and too pathetic. Her own attorneys sought vigourously to get the charges dismissed instead of simply waiting for a jury trial. Legitimate innocent persons are willing to go through a jury trial and are unwilling to accept any sort of plea deal. She has not been found to be "factually innocent" of the charges by judicial determination.CASE CLOSED!

Yes. I believe that Kristen Roush distributed her legs in an automobile by activating a gas peddle, a braking system, while in the company of a male student that SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN IN HER DAMN PERSONAL AUTOMOBILE IN THE FIRST PLACE. She distributed her legs over a car seat while a young male was in her presence. She used her legs to walk to an automobile. She used her legs to approach and position her body inorder to "hug" a male student. Pervert-minded subhumans interpret the phrase "distributing her filthy legs to a little eighth-grade boy" as meaning something other than what was culturally written. All perverts think about is something dirty like intercourse, while clean humans think non-physical activity Why doesn't Kristen Roush provide hugs and car rides to adult men she finds unattractive? Can she answer that question? Why didn't Orange County prosecutors investigate every detail of the sex life of this suspected female pervert and have her tested for HIV, HERPES, etc. She knew that her contract as a teacher prohibited such contact with a student, and she also knew that that computer system used by all teachers refutes certain other excuses she made. Perhaps she should publish the details of her teaching contract and list of required courses she must take that detail certain conduct is prohibited. IT IS AGAINST A TEACHER'S CONTRACT TO HUG A STUDENT!! THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN "INNOCENT HUG." KEEP YOUR DIRTY BODY AWAY FROM OUR STUDENTS!

No male student should be forced to endure a so-called "hug" from a perverted teacher. No married woman should be hugging any persons other than her own husband or children. STOP HUGGING STUDENTS! STOP TOUCHING STUDENTS! STUDENTS DO NOT NEED PERVERTED DISPLAYS OF AFFECTION. DIRECT STUDENTS TO SCHOLARSHIPS AND GRANTS! Kristen Roush claims she is completely innocent, but her attorney admits on a video that she "hugged" a student, and even took the student home. Those facts alone are evidence of perversion because such acts VIOLATE a teacher's sworn oath to NEVER TOUCH A STUDENT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, UNLESS THEY ARE PERFORMING CPR. Licensed teachers are required to watch hours of video tapes, and attend professional sessions detailing what conduct is prohibited. Every teacher in the United States of American understand s that HUGGING A STUDENT IS THE #1 RULE TO NOT VIOLATE. To successfully prosecute persons such Kristen Roush requires her teacher contract to be written in a way that ethical violations are admitted as criminal conduct. as HUGE RAD FLAG AND IS PROHIBITED.

From the very beginning, Orange County prosecutors never intended to charge AND prosecute Kristen Roush. No jail time was ever intended. Blonde teachers will never be prosecuted and imprisoned by a California prosecutor for raping or molesting students that are eligible for sholarships and grants. Parent can complain all they want. Your child will be raped, molested, and abused UNTL California prosecutors start acting like the state of Georgia and begin executing or seriously punishing immoral females. With California prosecutors so weak, in the end, charges will be dismissed, just as they were in the Laura Whitehurst case. No matter how strong the evidence, charges will always be dropped or reduced by male California prosecutors who are attracted to the suspect thay are supposed to be prosecuting. The objective of this costly and wasteful circus was only to "scare" Kristen Roush. She took a plea deal, agreeing to admit to one misdemeanor charge of battery on school property. All felony counts of lewd acts were dismissed, the Orange County District Attorney’s Office said. The Orange County District Attorney’s Office is a complete joke, and an embarrassment to the U.S. court process.